Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 19:01:25 12/03/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 1998 at 07:51:28, blass uri wrote: > >On December 03, 1998 at 05:49:37, Amir Ban wrote: > >>On December 03, 1998 at 05:21:19, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On December 03, 1998 at 05:04:52, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>On December 03, 1998 at 02:31:09, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: >>>> >>>>>Junior lost on time >>>> >>>>>[White "Junior 5 P200MMX 47MB"] >>>>>[Black "Fritz 3 P90 15MB"] >>>>>[Result "0-1"] >>>> >>>>I didn't think it is possible and programmes have implemented kind of panic time >>>>or so. Stil wondering.... >>> >>>It is possible >>>I discovered this bug before some weeks and told Amir Ban about it. >>> >>>Junior always feels a duty to finish all the moves in the iteration it does and >>>this is the reason for it. >>> >>>Usually it does not happen but it can happen 1 time out of many games. >>> >>> >> >>This is not supposed to happen. This is an engine interface issue. The engine >>tells the shell when it wants a wake-up call, and the shell sends it. This was >>not working properly for J46, but was fixed for J5. Looks like we didn't test it >>thouroughly enough. >> >>I suppose that what actually happened is that J5 declared itself lost ? There is >>no other way to lose on time in auto232. It's quite possible to overstep the >>time limit without anything happening. >> >>Amir >I looked in the times and the if I compute the total time of Junior5 then I see >that the time is only 6892 seconds so I do not understand why Junior lost in >time in this game. > >The total time of Firz3 was 7243 seconds after 37 moves and 2708 seconds for the >38 move. > >If there is no mistakes in the times that Junior5 printed then Fritz3 lost on >time > >Uri I really don't dare to trust my eyes, collegue Uri ! What should such a game setup teach ? A 48 megs 200MMX based 1998 prog comparing to a 1995 prog under a platform of 15 Megs P 90. THIS missleads, and THIS affects - clearly, the rating - noone to wonder. Tell me please - do you vary 200 MMX vs 200 MMX - or do you play, whatever combination you can gat a hold on ? maybe 5 or 6 of this abnormal setup in a row ? Then these ELO dimensions wouldn't wonder me a thing, anymore. ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.