Author: William Penn
Date: 06:04:35 02/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2004 at 08:49:25, Jouni Uski wrote: >On February 03, 2004 at 08:25:35, William Penn wrote: [snip] >>Is this a stunning endgame analysis? >>5+ hours hours runtime (05:35:47) in infinite analysis mode, all 3-4-5 piece >>tablebases, XP 2400+ at 2.0GHz, 1GB RAM, 512MB hash, native CB GUI with all >>default settings >> >>[D] 3r2k1/5pp1/2RP3p/pp1p4/8/4P3/PP4PP/6K1 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Shredder 8: >> >>[snip early lines] >> >>28.Kf2 f5 29.Ke1 a4 30.Ke2 Kf7 31.g4 fxg4 32.Rc4 dxc4 33.b3 axb3 34.Kd2 bxa2 >>35.d7 a1Q 36.h3 gxh3 37.Ke2 >> ² (0.67) Depth: 30/57 05:35:47 7919282kN, tb=472425 >> >>This is purely "giveaway chess"! >>WP > >Shredder has tendency to show anything nonsense in main line, but it don't >affect palying strength at all! Only first move is important. > >Jouni I know, that's the rationale we hear from the author, indirectly. But that requires a quantum leap of faith, and my spirit is weak today. :o) WP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.