Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: evidence?

Author: Thao Tak-Sen

Date: 07:16:04 02/03/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 03, 2004 at 10:01:48, Mike S. wrote:

>On February 03, 2004 at 09:13:22, Thao Tak-Sen wrote:
>
>>(...)
>
>>i'm assuming Zappa might be the Crafty clone,but i doubt it.this is not the
>>mistake against the charter.
>
>It is against "real life" charter (which goes above CCC charter) to issue such
>assumptions without giving any evidence. If you do that in public, you might be
>sued.
>
>(I cannot comment on how public CCC is considered regarding this, as it requires
>a password.)
>
>I'd say if he cannot bring evidence, he should be banned.
>
>Because if not, the next thing will be some people will "assume, but doubt" that
>every engine is every engine's clone...

i said, i doubt it.
how could i give you "evidence" without having a look at binary or source,file
size,more games?
nohing is shown
other program deserve the 3rd place in CCT6
why dont you consider it in a case of List?
Fritz Reul is afraid to speak,even after his exam
and in same case,Anthony outspoke
wait for "time to come"




This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.