Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: evidence?

Author: Thao Tak-Sen

Date: 07:16:04 02/03/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 03, 2004 at 10:01:48, Mike S. wrote:

>On February 03, 2004 at 09:13:22, Thao Tak-Sen wrote:
>
>>(...)
>
>>i'm assuming Zappa might be the Crafty clone,but i doubt it.this is not the
>>mistake against the charter.
>
>It is against "real life" charter (which goes above CCC charter) to issue such
>assumptions without giving any evidence. If you do that in public, you might be
>sued.
>
>(I cannot comment on how public CCC is considered regarding this, as it requires
>a password.)
>
>I'd say if he cannot bring evidence, he should be banned.
>
>Because if not, the next thing will be some people will "assume, but doubt" that
>every engine is every engine's clone...

i said, i doubt it.
how could i give you "evidence" without having a look at binary or source,file
size,more games?
nohing is shown
other program deserve the 3rd place in CCT6
why dont you consider it in a case of List?
Fritz Reul is afraid to speak,even after his exam
and in same case,Anthony outspoke
wait for "time to come"




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.