Author: Harald Faber
Date: 01:22:54 12/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 1998 at 22:44:14, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Dear all: >The issue about best settings for now CM6K is still debatable and so cannot be >putted in the resource section. Not that we expect the last word from jehovah, >but surely we don not want to ccarry to the center a dispute about what is the >very best setting. I hope that hose people that is experimenting inm that field >will be kind enbough to giove some data to support his own pet setting. A set of >test should be apllied to several settings before reaching the divine state >where you can expect to be elevated to the heaven of the resource section. In >other worss, we must be sure this or that sectting is a resource, not a >nuissance. >fernando Fernando and Elvis, I simply suggested to put the WP and HF settings into the resource center and mark them as "GOOD FOR CM4000/5X00". Would this be possible because these settings are known and proved to be stronger/better than the orginal ones. CM6k is outside this debate, I know and never claimed that these settings also work for CM6k.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.