Author: blass uri
Date: 03:05:10 12/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 1998 at 05:29:33, Jürgen Hartmann wrote: >The thing I enjoy to do with a chess program is interactive analysis. Trying >different lines with a program gives you the illusion to do something >intelligent and achieves superior results to just letting it run endlessly on >one position on its own. > >In the famous game Maroczy vs. Tartakower from 1922, Black build up a typical >Stonewall kings attack and crowned it with an intuitive rook sacrifice. For a >human it is easy to see the immense practical chances of this sacrifice and it >would be the first candidate move to calculate. But Junior5 and the Crafty >engine don't find it overnight on my P300. > >The position after 17.Nd2 was > >r1b3k1/pp1n3p/2pbpq1r/3p4/2PPp1p1/PP2P1P1/1BQN1P1P/3RRBK1 b - - 0 17 > >17... Rxh2!! > >Does any program see this? > >The question is: Do we have a fantastically tough testing position in the league >of Nolot here or is it simply incorrect? I think that it is simply incorrect for example white can defend by 21.Qc3(Junior5's move) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.