Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:29:04 02/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2004 at 18:46:54, Paul Doire wrote: >On February 03, 2004 at 17:22:52, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>instead of talking about something else you could have better QUALIFIED a >>statement that tells us why shredder8 is unable to see this happen, >>or to defend it accurate. >> >>Qc7 ? >> >>Isn't the Bxh6 and Rd3 stuff easy ?? > >Whats next??? Is Winchess also stronger than Shredder 8....ahem > >Paul I cannot understand your sarcasm. it should be allowed to point the finger on a position when a chess program (world computer chess champion) loses in a few moves on 2400 mhz using time controls of 40/120. Or is this something one should oversee when buying a chess program, that it has some weaknesses ?? But if it is not allowed to post a game in this forum i will never do of course. Maybe it is politcally not correct to post a game where the world computer chess champion loses against an old program on tournament time control.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.