Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder 8 For Sandro

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 16:38:51 02/03/04

Go up one level in this thread

On February 03, 2004 at 18:45:01, Paul Doire wrote:

>Hi Sarah,
>I concur, I have hundreds of blitz 3' to 45 min and Shredder 8
>rules...even on (antique) hardware.
>
>It reminds me of when Thorsten was saying Hiarcs 9 was better after
>I posted 30 games with S8 winning , then of course he claimed
>the wrong settings were used so I followed with another victory for
>Shredder 8 with the new seetings. 60 games in total.

your "results" were, when i remember it right on fossil hardware.
with a blitz time control.
no matter if you play 6 , 60 or 600 games in a row, the data is senseless.

shredder8 is the fastest in search depth. when you play blitz games on slow
hardware you measure this. but not the srtength. what you measure is IMO how
fast a program reaches a certain depth.

• Re: Shredder 8 For Sandro Paul Doire 17:08:45 02/03/04
  • Re: Shredder 8 For Sandro Thorsten Czub 17:40:26 02/03/04
    • Re: Shredder 8 For Sandro; For Thorsten Chesster Fritz 20:28:05 02/03/04
      • Re: Shredder 8 For Sandro; For Thorsten Thorsten Czub 10:51:38 02/04/04
    • Re: Shredder 8 For Sandro Paul Doire 17:41:53 02/03/04
      • CSTal2.03 vs. Shredder8, S8 score and depth Thorsten Czub 17:55:57 02/03/04
        • Re: CSTal2.03 vs. Shredder8, S8 score and depth Paul Doire 18:06:06 02/03/04
• Re: Shredder 8 For Sandro Paul Doire 17:02:12 02/03/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.