Author: Paul Doire
Date: 17:01:42 02/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2004 at 19:29:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 03, 2004 at 18:46:54, Paul Doire wrote: > >>On February 03, 2004 at 17:22:52, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>instead of talking about something else you could have better QUALIFIED a >>>statement that tells us why shredder8 is unable to see this happen, >>>or to defend it accurate. >>> >>>Qc7 ? >>> >>>Isn't the Bxh6 and Rd3 stuff easy ?? >> >>Whats next??? Is Winchess also stronger than Shredder 8....ahem >> >>Paul > >I cannot understand your sarcasm. it should be allowed to >point the finger on a position when a chess program (world computer chess >champion) loses in a few moves on 2400 mhz using time controls of 40/120. > >Or is this something one should oversee when buying a chess program, that it >has some weaknesses ?? > >But if it is not allowed to post a game in this forum i will never do of course. >Maybe it is politcally not correct to post a game where the world computer chess >champion loses against an old program on tournament time control. Thorsten, I have many , many games with Shredder 8 vs the world here (that I have posted) and certainly in your comments above this post to say it is such a poor engine is uncalled for and unsubstantiated by you. Do you have many games of Shredder 8 losing?? Where are they?? All engines have a glitch or two, even Hiarcs 9 (your last peeve) and Chess System Tal II. The real test is how they do against all others. There have been far too many posts of the new Shredder's power i.e. Kurt's games for just one. For your claims to hold any merit. Regards, Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.