Author: eric guttenberg
Date: 17:06:08 02/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2004 at 19:33:41, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 03, 2004 at 19:28:38, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Instead of asking Qc7 ?? Why don't you explain why CSTal II lost 4 straight to >>an inferior program with less knowledge? > >I see no sense in talking about the next data when not having an answer to the >first data. > >Also it is IMO completely unimportant to discuss how a program plays that was >build 1999 in 2004. > >But it is IMO important to see how a TODAY's program (i paid 50 EURO for it) >plays on 40/120. > >To value your point i would have to replay your data. but in the moment i am not >interested in such a waste of time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.