Author: Kurt Tank
Date: 18:03:50 02/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2004 at 12:11:30, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 03, 2004 at 11:15:56, Bigler wrote: > >>What's going on with this engine ? >> >>It look so strong during the Graz tournament. > > >but in graz they had different hardware. and few games. > > >>Now I have it and have set a double round tournament with the following engines >>: >>Deep Junior 8 >>Shredder 7.04 >>Hiarcs 9 >>Deep Fritz 8 >>Ruffian Leiden >>Ruffian 2 >> >>There is only 5 games left and the Shredder 8 result is the worst, even >>catasrophique. By the way, Deep Fritz 8 is not very good as well. > >to me this looks right. >My impression from shredder8 is that it is not really stronger. it is different. >it outsearches many search based programs, but has weaknesses when the opponent >has specific or much knowledge. >since many knowledge programs have a lack of search depth, sometimes shredder >can outsearch the knowledge programs too. but not that often. > >overall i do not see shredder beeing really superior anymore. > > >>First is Hiarcs 9 then Ruffian Leiden and far from all other engines is Shredder >>8. > >right. this would be my ranking too. >first hiarcs. > > > >>WHATS HAPPENING WITH SHREDDER 8 ? > > > >>It seems to search more deeply than Shredder 7.04 i.e. when Shredder 7.04 is at >>14 ply depth, Shredder 8 is at 17. > > >but it oversees things. thats the price. But you must Test Deep Junior 8 on a dual computer vs Hiarcs 9 and you will notice that Amir Ban's program is clearly superior
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.