Author: Harald Faber
Date: 21:35:34 02/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 03, 2004 at 19:33:41, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 03, 2004 at 19:28:38, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Instead of asking Qc7 ?? Why don't you explain why CSTal II lost 4 straight to >>an inferior program with less knowledge? > >I see no sense in talking about the next data when not having an answer to the >first data. You know the answer. Bxh6 is no forced win. It is speculative. This time it worked in the end. Maybe some other program would have defended better and draw or even won with black. All in all the clear majority of CSTal's sacs do NOT work...
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.