Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Testposition of Matador-Alarm CCT6

Author: Gerd Isenberg

Date: 10:49:54 02/04/04

Go up one level in this thread


>Yes, it is really difficult to evaluate this position. Probably Matador had have
>some luck to evaluate it correctly?!
>I expect the trhree passers are stronger than the additional black piece!? In my
>opinion their strength will strongly increase after a further queen exchange.
>Matador likes the white position and evaluates it with +1 after a short search.
>My static evaluation says, the postion is stable.

Maybe i should have a closer look to my connected passers code.

I had some bad experience with "huge" connected passer bonusses a piece down and
the additional opponent's bishop controls the (far)stop squares and the passers
are not so much advanced and opponent king is "near" enough...
Very often such passers got fixed on squares of opposite bishops square color.

>
>I am looking forward to see you in Paderborn :-)
>

me too, oh god it's already next week ;-)
Gerd

>Stefan




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.