Author: Karsten Bauermeister
Date: 10:45:31 12/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 1998 at 06:52:12, Mark Uniacke wrote: >On December 03, 1998 at 18:58:19, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>I would like to know what settings where used for CM6000, and what size hash. I >>would assume out of the box settings and hash. >> >>If that is the case, then like Hiarces which was I hear beta version 7, then I >>think these two programs results are under rated. > >I agree, but CM6000 deserves the most credit as it was running on some >pretty slow hardware: K6-233 16Mb and a P133 4Mb >Especially when you compare that to most of the other programs. > >I think CM6000 should be tested more on equal hardware to see how strong >it really is, it clearly is very strong. Its a pity an autotest interface >could'nt be put into it by its producers for SSDF testing. > >> >>But still, being that, they did perform very well, did they not. > >Best wishes, > Mark I agree totally with Marc. The Chessmaster was one of the positive surprises in our tournament. Johan seems to improve his program more than 0.7 points like the versions-jump could make believe. :-) Karsten Karsten
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.