Author: James T. Walker
Date: 15:31:28 02/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2004 at 08:48:16, Mike Byrne wrote: >On February 05, 2004 at 08:10:26, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On February 04, 2004 at 22:04:22, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>On February 04, 2004 at 21:48:41, James T. Walker wrote: >>> >>>>I'm also having very poor results with Crafty from Mike. I've only tested blitz >>>>games but so far it's rating is well below all other Crafty's I have except >>>>18.3. >>>>Jim >>> >>>Hi Jim, >>> >>>a couple of questions -- >>> >>>OS? >>> >>>processor? >>> >>>ponder on/off? >>> >>>also can you run the "bench" command with no crafty.rc file and post your >>>results? >>> >>>for my machine: >>> >>>Total nodes: 89942714 >>>Raw nodes per second: 633399 >>>Total elapsed time: 142 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 4.507042 >>> >>> >>>thanks, >>> >>>Mike >> >>Hello Mike, >>My machine is an XP2400+/Win98. >>I only copied the NPS from the bench test. >>with/RC file 934,342 >>No/RC file 927,244 >>Jim > >I sent you anew executbale -- is that one a little faster ? > >Can you run the same command "bench" with Skinner's executbale? The above info is for your new exe file. I don't have Peters exe file. Results with your new exe are actually even worse than the first. Only 44 games played but against exact same opponent under same conditions. The best Crafty I have so far is the 19.7mmx with 19.9 almost the same. Remember I am only testing at blitz time controls and Crafty is notorious for poor blitz performance. Also I don't have enough games to say for sure how it's doing. I will run more games tonight. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.