Author: John Merlino
Date: 17:54:08 02/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2004 at 20:44:11, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On February 05, 2004 at 20:30:58, John Merlino wrote: > >>How long did it take Yace to come up with this mate score and on what CPU? >>What's the PV? > >It was after some (not very much - perhaps 20 minutes) backwards analysis (the >score should be correct; there are no tricks - just try to remember previous >analysis). Sorry, when I made sounded like Yace would find the mate score by >itself soon. I didn't intend to sound like this. Also thought, it might be clear >by my other previously sent post. > >For the PV - see my other post: >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?347414. With a bit of time, I >should be able to get a nicer PV, that shows all the moves until mate. > >Without that backward analysis, the PV seems to start exactly the same (but no >mate score fast). > >I believe, 1.Rb8 and 1.Rxg8 are winning. > >Regards, >Dieter Ok, I understand. And I agree that both moves win, now that I've seen some other analysis. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.