Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 05:49:07 02/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2004 at 23:40:21, Chesster Fritz wrote: >However, in my preliminary analysis, I found moves that S8 most likely wouldn't >play as I tested your game and found dubious moves in your PGN! :-)))) dubious moves ?! :-))) maybe shredder8 was drunken :-)) >I'll give you some leeway, but it's my opinion you tampered with S8 ensuring a >loss and a victory for CSTAL2.03. :-))) the programs play. i do only move the mouse and input what the program outputs. >If you did tamper with S8 during the game, and I suspect you did, shame on you! ?? shame on you. >I don't care for testers who give Fudged Data! i don't care for anonymous posters who piss on other people. >It appears blantantly obvious, you want to discredit Shredder 8. :-))) why should i ? i know SMK and he is a nice guy. >This attitude in testing is simply wrong, and No One will trust your methods. :-))) which methods. this was a game of chess. is this a method ?? >My verdict isn't out, hurry up :-)) before the spanish flue catches you. >but leeway or not, something appears wrong with your >game, maybe i shall run shredder8 on a slower computer ? 2400 mhz is maybe too fast ... >i.e. certain moves were made by S8 and they don't appear in my S8 program. wow !! you should give your shredder version back !! where did you bought it ?! maybe it is broken :-))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.