Author: Paul Doire
Date: 14:55:52 02/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2004 at 17:43:49, Mike Byrne wrote: >On February 07, 2004 at 17:33:37, Paul Doire wrote: > >>Hi , >>This is with Mike's new compile. >>542 Mhz, Win98SE >>128MBRam, 16Hash >>3,4,5 Tablebases >>Ponder Off >>Own Books >>5 Min blitz games >> >>CraftySE(2) vs Ruffian 2 Own books Blitz 5' >> >> 123456789012345678901234567890 >>1 Ruffian 2.0.0 01010½1½1001½101011001½0010011 15.0/30 225.00 >>2 Crafty 19.10 SE 10101½0½0110½010100110½1101100 15.0/30 225.00 >> >>Crafty looks good here. Also Mike on my machine your newest compile >>is faster than both Dann's and Peter's. > >It's hard to believe 10%-15% speed up makes a difference - but it seem to for >Crafty against Ruffian. The latest PGO version is about 10-15% faster on all >non P4 Intel processors. This includes P3s, AMDs and Celerons. For ALL P4s (so >far) , the original version (dated 2/2/04) is faster. Ironically, the PGO >version was compiled with Intel's Profile Guided Optimizations tool. this tool >makes a faster compile for the non P4 (AMD, etc)) and a slower compile for P4s >(Intel). > >I have a P4 (Intel). Based on the benchmarks received, Crafty is much faster on >AMD on a per/GHz basis. In the old world (pre P4), that never used to happen. >My next machine may be an AMD processor based. http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000253 Regards, Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.