Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 11:01:34 02/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2004 at 13:23:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 08, 2004 at 10:32:14, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On February 08, 2004 at 10:29:58, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>Aloisio, >>> >>>My apologies ...I was correcting a misposting by me and when I deleted my post, >>>I accidently entered the wrong message number. The wrong number was your post >>>below. >>> >>>Michael >>> >>> >>>====================================================================== >>>Posted by Aloisio Ponti Lopes (Profile) on February 08, 2004 at 09:11:45: >>> >>> >>>Which one is faster FOR CHESS: a Pentium4-HT 3.2 GHz or a Dual Athlon 2x2.4 GHz >>>? >>> >>>A. Ponti >> >> >>My guess is that dual Athlon 2.4 Ghz would be faster than single P4 3.2 Ghz CPU >>. > >For DIEP about 2.0 times faster. > >2.127Ghz K7 gives about 100k nps here >P4 3.2Ghz (800Mhz bus) with 2 threads see aceshardware.com > >so do the math. I don't like the comparison at aceshardware, they compare nps directly between Diep on the Athlon with one thread and the P4 with two threads. I think they should have mentioned that the efficiency of the extra thread isn't 100%. So I'm left asking, "What does the test show?" and "How much faster is the Athlon for Diep?". -S. >Overclocking the P4 to 3.5ghz or so and also overclocking bus doing that is >speeding up the node count of diep quite some though. Way more than i had >expected, as proven by Ron Langeveld. > >>Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.