Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: 200 vs 166fsb, large hash size increase was 17.4% in s8

Author: Aaron Gordon

Date: 13:54:26 02/08/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 08, 2004 at 16:18:49, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>>That only shows how bad a P4 3.0 GHz is.
>>
>>A Athlon @ 2.4 GHz (Real 2.4 not a 2400+) has a Shreddermark of 2784 (440kN/s)
>>at 64 MB Hash. With 409 MB Has (To compare with the 2 GHz Opteron) it is 1237
>>(191 kN/s).
>>
>>I would be higly interested in a Shreddermark on that opteron with 64 MB Hash.
>>
>>Bye Ingo
>
>Here is my over year old Athlon XP 2100+ (1.73GHz) running 2505MHz,
>200fsb(400DDR), Epox 8RDA motherboard.
>
>ShredderMark8:
>64mb hash : 3712 @ 503kn/s
>409mb hash: 2227 @ 309kn/s

Above test was done @ 200fsb as I mentioned before. Here is 2.5GHz again but at
166fsb, identical memory timings (3-4-4-9)

64mb hash : 3712 @ 476kn/s
409mb hash: 1856 @ 263kn/s

As you can see at 64mb hash going from 166 to 200fsb yielded a 5.6% increase in
kn/s and at 409mb hash the increase was 17.4%. I will test again at 218MHz fsb.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.