Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 218, 200, and 166fsb compared in S8

Author: Ingo Bauer

Date: 14:21:57 02/08/04

Go up one level in this thread

Hi

>
>Shredder8Mark:
>
>Athlon XP 2.5GHz / 218fsb(436DDR):
>64mb hash : 504kn/s  -  3712 Shredder8Mark
>409mb hash: 334kn/s  -  2227 Shredder8Mark
>
>Athlon XP 2.5GHz / 200fsb(400DDR):
>64mb hash : 503kn/s  -  3712 Shredder8Mark
>409mb hash: 309kn/s  -  2227 Shredder8Mark
>
>Athlon XP 2.5GHz / 166fsb(333DDR):
>64mb hash : 476kn/s  -  3712 Shredder8Mark
>409mb hash: 263kn/s  -  1856 Shredder8Mark
>
>I'm impressed.. going from 166 to 218 resulted in a 27% increase in kn/s. Way
>back in the day when I tested Crafty it showed no increase in kn/s from changes
>in bus speeds (latency or memory bandwidth). Interesting... Looks like my next
>system will be a freon cooled Athlon FX running over 3GHz and 300fsb

Dont trust this Shreddermark!

Check the same thing with a Fritzmark and/or Crafty. Somethings wrong weith that
Shreddermark.

Ingo

• Real tests finished (not shreddermark) Aaron Gordon 15:12:42 02/08/04
  • shredder marks has no problem Vincent Diepeveen 18:45:09 02/08/04
    • Re: shredder marks has no problem Aaron Gordon 05:17:11 02/09/04
      • Re: shredder marks has no problem Vincent Diepeveen 05:32:55 02/09/04
        • Re: shredder marks has no problem Aaron Gordon 06:36:23 02/09/04
          • Re: shredder marks has no problem Vincent Diepeveen 14:29:09 02/09/04
            • Re: shredder marks has no problem Aaron Gordon 14:36:44 02/09/04
              • Re: shredder marks has no problem Vincent Diepeveen 15:32:30 02/09/04
          • Re: shredder marks has no problem Robert Hyatt 09:22:36 02/09/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.