Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 03:29:25 02/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2004 at 06:07:12, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On February 09, 2004 at 05:27:35, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On February 09, 2004 at 04:53:36, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On February 09, 2004 at 04:27:43, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>The match was done using an Athlon 1.2 GHz with 256 MB and each program was >>>>using its own setting from factory. I know that 30 games are not enough games to >>>>make aconcrete judgement of what program is better but at least I got an idea >>>>:-) >>> >>>Yes, but unfortunately it's the wrong idea. :) >> >>What is wrong, please be specific ? I am not implying that one program is better >>than the other, simply that a match between them indicate that they are of equal >>strength. >> >>Jorge > >A match can not indicate that. >Aristarch is stronger than AnMon. This hasn't changed. > >Michael It is NOT just one match, I also finished testing AnMon 530 versus the strongest free Engine Ruffian 1.0.5 and AnMon won. Now I am testing it versus List 512. Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.