Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 12:01:37 02/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2004 at 12:24:21, Paul Doire wrote: >On February 09, 2004 at 05:04:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>this seems to indicate that shredder8 is NOT that superior as it was >>announced/claimed here. > >So these 20 games lead you to this conclusion? >After the hundreds that have been posted here? >Sometimes we believe what we want even in the face >of evidence to the contrary. > >Paul your games were on slow hardware. chessfuns games were not with increment. my results and my data, and the results of this guy are IMO different. i see no evidence.i see games that are worthless for me because they were played on old hardware or 3 minutes blitz. i see more serious data elsewhere,and i see that it fits exactly with my observations.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.