Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why AMD just don`t blow Intel...

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 12:38:30 02/09/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 09, 2004 at 15:36:18, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On February 09, 2004 at 15:07:27, Joachim Rang wrote:
>
>>On February 09, 2004 at 14:59:42, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>On February 09, 2004 at 14:52:06, Joachim Rang wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 09, 2004 at 14:47:59, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On February 09, 2004 at 14:23:55, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>... by releasing their processors at the same speed in GHz ?
>>>>>
>>>>>Intel has the best fab in the world.  How is AMD going to match that?  The speed
>>>>>is largely a function of the process and trace size.  Intel's fascilities are
>>>>>better.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>that is only half of the truth (at best). AMD decided to concentrate on
>>>>performance rather than on GHz. So AMD proc perform more instructions per cycle.
>>>>  I think it would be technically possible to release today a 5 GHz proc which
>>>>performs only one instruction per cycle. The performance would be terrible, but
>>>>one could claim it runs on 5 GHz.
>>>
>>>And you believe that a chip which performed 10 instructions per cycle would not
>>>run at the same speed given the same trace size and process (e.g. copper
>>>bonded)?
>>>
>>>I think if AMD had Intel's fascilities, they could produce Opterons at 3.4 GHz.
>>>
>>>I think many facets of AMD's design are better.  But Intel's fascilities are
>>>superior.
>>
>>
>>No I think you are wrong. 10 instruction per cycle produce a lot more heat than
>>1 instruction per cycle.
>
>No way.  The transister count, transistor density, and materials process are
>what matters.
>
>> I think the design of the AMD procs dont allow >3 GHz
>>yet (this will come of course with 90 and 65 nm).
>>I don't think with the fascilities of Intel AMD would be able to release
>>Opterons at 3.4 GHz but I may be wrong.
>>
>>Who is an expert in this field?
>
>Tom Kerrigan.  There are some others who post here.  My understanding is
>strictly amateur, though I do have a year of electronics training.

Voltage.  I forgot voltage, which is very important also (P=IE)




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.