Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 14:56:50 02/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2004 at 20:53:45, Slater Wold wrote: >On February 08, 2004 at 16:34:57, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>On February 08, 2004 at 10:29:58, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>Aloisio, >>> >>>My apologies ...I was correcting a misposting by me and when I deleted my post, >>>I accidently entered the wrong message number. The wrong number was your post >>>below. >>> >>>Michael >>> >>> >>>====================================================================== >>>Posted by Aloisio Ponti Lopes (Profile) on February 08, 2004 at 09:11:45: >>> >>> >>>Which one is faster FOR CHESS: a Pentium4-HT 3.2 GHz or a Dual Athlon 2x2.4 GHz >>>? >>> >>>A. Ponti >> >>Even a dual Athlon 1.5GHz would be faster than a P4-3.2GHz HT. A dual 2.4GHz >>Athlon would be about twice as fast. Here are the numbers I have for Crafty, >>these are rounded numbers: >> >>P4-3.2GHz: 1.3 million nodes/sec >>P4-3.2GHz HT: 1.5 million nodes/sec > > >Don't know what version you're testing with, but that's what I get on the latest >release with my 3.0Ghz. Yes, I was using an older version. The speed gap would remain the same (but show different kn/s) with a newer (or older) version. >>Athlon 2.4GHz: 1.5 million nodes/sec >> >>Dual Athlon 2.4GHz: 2.9 million nodes/sec >>Dual P4-3.2HT: 2.9 million nodes/sec >> >>So, a Dual Athlon 2.4GHz @ 2.9 million nodes/sec is significantly faster than a >>single P4-3.2GHz w/ HT.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.