Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 17:19:14 02/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2004 at 14:54:12, Dan Andersson wrote: > It's not that simple. Intel and AMD have taken different design paths. Intel >was caught off guard by the AMD Athlon processor. And had to go the way of the >megahurtz. The analogy would be a race where AMD has the long legged and >powerful stride. While Intel's short legs must work at a much higher frequency >to keep up. > And the heat issue is really a non issue. AMD chips are designed to operate at >higher temperatures. And additionally the P4 is running hotter. It dissipates a >hell of a lot of watts. > >MvH Dan Andersson You're running a generation behind it's A64 versus P4E nowadays :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.