Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: First run...

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 19:40:14 02/09/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 09, 2004 at 21:43:05, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>On February 09, 2004 at 21:14:55, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>>On February 09, 2004 at 20:16:06, Aaron Gordon wrote:
>>
>>>On February 09, 2004 at 20:05:31, Slater Wold wrote:
>>>
>>>>On February 09, 2004 at 19:50:08, Aaron Gordon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On February 09, 2004 at 19:43:39, Slater Wold wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Windows XP Pro SP1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nothing else installed, or running, straight out of the box.
>>>>>>The exe is from Aaron, I *think*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>EPD Kit revision date: 1996.04.21
>>>>>>unable to open book file [./book.bin].
>>>>>>book is disabled
>>>>>>found computer opening book file [./bookc.bin].
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Crafty v19.3 (1 cpus)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>White(1): bench
>>>>>>Running benchmark. . .
>>>>>>......
>>>>>>Total nodes: 62767030
>>>>>>Raw nodes per second: 1569175
>>>>>>Total elapsed time: 40
>>>>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 16.000000
>>>>>>White(1):
>>>>>
>>>>>Try this Athlon XP copy I have, see how that works out until I can get all this
>>>>>crap installed. :P
>>>>>
>>>>>ftp://newageoc.com/pub/crafty/c197-k7sse.rar
>>>>>or
>>>>>ftp://newageoc.com/pub/crafty/c198-k7sse.rar
>>>>
>>>>I got 19.8 - And here it is running 2.36Ghz:
>>>>
>>>>C:\crafty>c198-k7sse
>>>>unable to open book file [./book.bin].
>>>>book is disabled
>>>>found computer opening book file [./bookc.bin].
>>>>
>>>>Crafty v19.8
>>>>
>>>>White(1): bench
>>>>Running benchmark. . .
>>>>......
>>>>Total nodes: 100409445
>>>>Raw nodes per second: 1619507
>>>>Total elapsed time: 62
>>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 10.322581
>>>>White(1):
>>>
>>>Both runs w/ the Athlon XP 2.5GHz / 200fsb(400DDR) to compare to yours..
>>>
>>>Crafty v19.8
>>>
>>>White(1): bench
>>>Running benchmark. . .
>>>......
>>>Total nodes: 100409445
>>>Raw nodes per second: 1544760
>>>Total elapsed time: 65
>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 9.846154
>>
>>4% over you.  Probably dead even with me at stock speed.
>>
>>You know how to make someone who just spent a whole bunch of money, feel real
>>good Aaron.  :(
>
>Heh, that was not my intention at all. Just put a few things into light though..
>When you switch to a 64bit binary you're going to SMOKE. :) Also, when you kick
>your voltage up and overclock to 2.5-2.7ghz it'll be just that much faster. THEN
>you will leave my system in the dust by far. I'd follow your lead with the FX..
>but uh.. just dumped a load of $ on a new hobby. Out of the computer race for a
>while.

I know.  This chip is amazing.  Lower clock speed than you, and still faster.
And like you said, we aren't in 64 bit yet.  I was just kidding.  But it is
something I know someone out there said, and took seriously.  :)

I can alter the vcore.  Up to 3v!  Stock is 1.5v.  I don't know if you know this
or not, but this motherboard has *2* vcore's.  Just in case you blow one up.
And they are interchangable!  With dual BIOS, I swear, they want people to
punish this board.  Also, the power supply I got has dual 12v rails, and a bunch
of other good stuff.  It'll be interesting...

Running 2.36Ghz stable as can be.  Without bumping the AGP, vcore, or memory
voltage.  Go up one more mhz, and it locks.  I am letting it 'burn in' over nite
(at my work actually), and then tomorrow, I'll push it as hard as it can go.

I'd be happy with 2.5Ghz.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.