Author: Paul Doire
Date: 09:21:30 02/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2004 at 09:31:55, Chessfun wrote: >On February 10, 2004 at 09:12:00, Paul Doire wrote: > >>I bet someone will find something wrong with these games :-) >> >>Paul > >You can always look and *pick* at any aspect of games someone posts. However I >do have the engine output/score/time as well. But as has been said before the >number of people reporting Shredder 8 winning long games or tournaments is many. > >Another by a respected member of CCC. 70 long games, and since Thorsten always >claims the book matters not, then the fact these were played with engines using >the same book should also suit him. >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?347764 > >Sarah. Isn't it interesting that we all post results and games to back up our current opinions, or we post games for entertainment....with no opinion. We offer substance and some form of documemted results. Others boldly post and condemn with no evidence to back them up, except maybe a few games posted by others. So, therefore I now say that Winchess is the best engine, all my games prove this. However unfortunately, I never saved any of them and have none to post. I will sit back and condemn those who disagree with me. Additionally, I will wait for the *rare* post that agrees with me so I can feel justified in my unsubstantiated opinions.:-):-):-) Regards, Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.