Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 23:14:41 02/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2004 at 00:46:02, Slater Wold wrote: >On February 10, 2004 at 23:42:02, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On February 10, 2004 at 13:00:34, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >> >>>Here are the results of the different compiled version of Crafty. Your's is just >>>a hair (1.4%) faster then all of the others. >> >>Give these two a try and see how they do on your system. I compiled them with >>MSVC .NET 2003. They were a hair faster than Aaron's on my Athlon 2400+ (after >>hours of tinkering with compiler options). >> >>Without FUTILITY: >>http://home.comcast.net/~r.reagan/crafty19.10.zip >> >>With FUTILITY: >>http://home.comcast.net/~r.reagan/crafty19.10f.zip > >Aaron's: > > >Crafty v19.10 > >White(1): bench >Running benchmark. . . >...... >Total nodes: 102625951 >Raw nodes per second: 1603530 >Total elapsed time: 64 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 10.000000 >White(1): > > >Russell's: > >C:\crafty>crafty19.10f >unable to open book file [./book.bin]. >book is disabled >found computer opening book file [./bookc.bin]. > >Crafty v19.10 > >White(1): bench >Running benchmark. . . >...... >Total nodes: 89942714 >Raw nodes per second: 1697032 >Total elapsed time: 53 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 12.075472 This can't be the FX system.. What did you run this on? -elc.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.