Author: Slater Wold
Date: 23:17:46 02/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2004 at 02:14:41, enrico carrisco wrote: >On February 11, 2004 at 00:46:02, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On February 10, 2004 at 23:42:02, Russell Reagan wrote: >> >>>On February 10, 2004 at 13:00:34, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >>> >>>>Here are the results of the different compiled version of Crafty. Your's is just >>>>a hair (1.4%) faster then all of the others. >>> >>>Give these two a try and see how they do on your system. I compiled them with >>>MSVC .NET 2003. They were a hair faster than Aaron's on my Athlon 2400+ (after >>>hours of tinkering with compiler options). >>> >>>Without FUTILITY: >>>http://home.comcast.net/~r.reagan/crafty19.10.zip >>> >>>With FUTILITY: >>>http://home.comcast.net/~r.reagan/crafty19.10f.zip >> >>Aaron's: >> >> >>Crafty v19.10 >> >>White(1): bench >>Running benchmark. . . >>...... >>Total nodes: 102625951 >>Raw nodes per second: 1603530 >>Total elapsed time: 64 >>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 10.000000 >>White(1): >> >> >>Russell's: >> >>C:\crafty>crafty19.10f >>unable to open book file [./book.bin]. >>book is disabled >>found computer opening book file [./bookc.bin]. >> >>Crafty v19.10 >> >>White(1): bench >>Running benchmark. . . >>...... >>Total nodes: 89942714 >>Raw nodes per second: 1697032 >>Total elapsed time: 53 >>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 12.075472 > >This can't be the FX system.. What did you run this on? > >-elc. LOL - My FX51 @ 2.4Ghz... I promise.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.