Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 02:01:33 02/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2004 at 02:17:46, Slater Wold wrote: >On February 11, 2004 at 02:14:41, enrico carrisco wrote: > >>On February 11, 2004 at 00:46:02, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On February 10, 2004 at 23:42:02, Russell Reagan wrote: >>> >>>>On February 10, 2004 at 13:00:34, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >>>> >>>>>Here are the results of the different compiled version of Crafty. Your's is just >>>>>a hair (1.4%) faster then all of the others. >>>> >>>>Give these two a try and see how they do on your system. I compiled them with >>>>MSVC .NET 2003. They were a hair faster than Aaron's on my Athlon 2400+ (after >>>>hours of tinkering with compiler options). >>>> >>>>Without FUTILITY: >>>>http://home.comcast.net/~r.reagan/crafty19.10.zip >>>> >>>>With FUTILITY: >>>>http://home.comcast.net/~r.reagan/crafty19.10f.zip >>> >>>Aaron's: >>> >>> >>>Crafty v19.10 >>> >>>White(1): bench >>>Running benchmark. . . >>>...... >>>Total nodes: 102625951 >>>Raw nodes per second: 1603530 >>>Total elapsed time: 64 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 10.000000 >>>White(1): >>> >>> >>>Russell's: >>> >>>C:\crafty>crafty19.10f >>>unable to open book file [./book.bin]. >>>book is disabled >>>found computer opening book file [./bookc.bin]. >>> >>>Crafty v19.10 >>> >>>White(1): bench >>>Running benchmark. . . >>>...... >>>Total nodes: 89942714 >>>Raw nodes per second: 1697032 >>>Total elapsed time: 53 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 12.075472 >> >>This can't be the FX system.. What did you run this on? >> >>-elc. > >LOL - My FX51 @ 2.4Ghz... > >I promise. Did new additions to Crafty slow down its nps? Mid 19.xx's I was at 1.65m on the XP @ 2.5GHz. I'll have to ask Aaron what his box runs his executeable at, to compare with your results (for 19.10) -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.