Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:09:44 02/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 11, 2004 at 12:50:40, Peter Berger wrote: >On February 11, 2004 at 10:10:16, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 11, 2004 at 09:20:09, Peter Berger wrote: >> >>>Cute and surprising result for Bringer - I don't think I ever saw this one >>>solved before. >> >>I did not investigate the position but >>one of the questions to answer is if the move is winning and only winning move. >> >>Some tree by yace that proves a big score for white after Ng5(at least +2.xx >>pawns) if you can generate it may be convincing that Ng5 is probably winning. >> >>Uri > >*You* did not investigate the position - but *I* should generate a tree with >yace to convince you that the solution is correct ?! Something is very wrong >with this logic IMHO. > >Peter The point is that I did not claim something about the position and I did not claim that the solution is correct or wrong. Hsu suggested a different move(Bg5) after a lot of analysis. Saying:"I don't think I ever saw this one solved before." means that there is a solution so I responded to make clear that we have no proof that there is a justified solution. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.