Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 13:48:08 02/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
Roy, I get a Shredder Mark of 861 with 192 MB of Hashtables on a 1500 Mhz AMD with 512 MB of RAM. The Pentium IV 2.8 GHz is obviously twice as efficient at running code as the "old" AMDs. I suppose the ShredderMark is not a linear measure. Then again..... Don't worry be happy, Tio Timmy On February 11, 2004 at 16:34:05, Roy Eassa wrote: >My PC is a 1.2 GHz Athlon. I get a ShredderMark of 556 / 128k nps when Shredder >8 is set to 190k hash. > >I just bought a cheap very Dell system that usess a 2.8 GHz Pentium IV. I >figured it would be less than twice as fast. Instead, I get a ShredderMark of >2227 / 297k nps (also using 190k hash)! > >First, why is the ShredderMark 4x as high when the integer performance of the >CPU should be less than 2x as high? > >Second, why isn't the ShredderMark's improvement proportional to that of the >nps?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.