Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 17:39:02 12/05/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 1998 at 04:41:17, Harald Faber wrote: >On December 04, 1998 at 00:52:06, blass uri wrote: > >>>Tell me please - do you vary 200 MMX vs 200 MMX - or do you play, whatever >>>combination you can gat a hold on ? >> >>I do not play between computers. >>The ssdf volunteers do it. >>The ssdf volunteers always give new programs better hardware. >>It is not misleading because in the rating list there is no fritz3(pentium200) >>but only Fritz3(pentium90). >>Uri > >But what is to say against playing Fritz3/200MMX?? It should be very >interesting, agreed? Or does anyone hold the hand on this so that one can't say >"Fritz3/200MMX is (almost) as strong as Fritz5/200MMX" (what of course would >reduce Fritz5 sells) although none expects this would happen in the >games/results/ranking but still possible? >I think there are many interestes in watching Fritz3, Genius3 and >Chessmaster4000/5000 play on 200MMX against a) the follow-ups and b) the new >beasts. Is it still up to me/us to do such matches/contests? I can't believe it. >>It is not misleading because in the rating list there is no fritz3(pentium200) >>but only Fritz3(pentium90). Oh - really ! You give me brandnew sights of how a rating is made........ took so many years to finally meet the expert - praise the Lord ! To come back serious : do you really wanna make believe, what you're writing ? Or is this an expanation error ? ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.