Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:42:47 02/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2004 at 06:16:53, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On February 12, 2004 at 06:03:37, Uri Blass wrote: > >[snip] > >>The main point is that programs should not evaluate unclear position as winning. >> >>Black has a big advantage without capturing the pawn so there is no reason to >>capture h3 and get unclear pawn endgame. >> >>evaluating Rxh3 Rh2 as a win for white without search is a msitake but >>evaluating it as a win for black is also a mistake that cause Crafty to miss a >>simple win by not capturing the pawn. > >And again I'm reminded of the posts some months ago, in which someone suggested >to have some kind of an uncertainty-value together with a score. In this case, >the machine could decide that it's better to play a move with score +1 (5% >uncertainty) than a move with score +2 (70% uncertainty). No score should consider the uncertianty inside of it. The score is in pawns but can be also translated to an expected result. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.