Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: check this position too! - a minor modification with major consequen

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 06:35:11 02/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


On February 12, 2004 at 08:24:23, Daniel Clausen wrote:

>On February 12, 2004 at 06:42:47, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On February 12, 2004 at 06:16:53, Daniel Clausen wrote:
>>
>>>On February 12, 2004 at 06:03:37, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>[snip]
>>>
>>>>The main point is that programs should not evaluate unclear position as winning.
>>>>
>>>>Black has a big advantage without capturing the pawn so there is no reason to
>>>>capture h3 and get unclear pawn endgame.
>>>>
>>>>evaluating Rxh3 Rh2 as a win for white without search is a msitake but
>>>>evaluating it as a win for black is also a mistake that cause Crafty to miss a
>>>>simple win by not capturing the pawn.
>>>
>>>And again I'm reminded of the posts some months ago, in which someone suggested
>>>to have some kind of an uncertainty-value together with a score. In this case,
>>>the machine could decide that it's better to play a move with score +1 (5%
>>>uncertainty) than a move with score +2 (70% uncertainty).
>>
>>No
>>
>>score should consider the uncertianty inside of it.
>>The score is in pawns but can be also translated to an expected result.
>>
>>Uri
>
>You claim "my" suggestion doesn't work w/o really proving anything. Just because
>everyone isn't doing it that way doesn't mean the idea doesn't have any merit. I
>think the idea is worth it _for me_ to investigate and will do so in my engine.
>I'm aware it doesn't fit in the current minimax principle that well, but that
>doesn't mean it's useless either. (whether the implementation is (score,
>uncertainty%) or something else is another thing)
>
>Btw: "score should consider the uncertainty inside of it" doesn't make a whole
>lot of sense to me. When I say in statistics that the value is in the interval
>[a, b] with a certainty of 95%, I also can't put this 95% in the interval - or I
>end up with [-inf, +inf].
>
>Sargon

Score is about expected result.
You need to compare between leaves.
If you say +1 is better than +2 then the +1 and +2 are not final scores of the
leaves and only numbers that help to compute the final scores.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.