Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 11:30:07 02/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2004 at 13:24:35, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On February 12, 2004 at 12:35:03, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>A fellow student of me got an Athlon64 3200 for his phD work at university and >>installed the x86-64 version of Suse9. I could not resist to quickly compile >>crafty to test the speed. :) >> >>unable to open book file [./book.bin]. >>book is disabled >>unable to open book file [./books.bin]. >>EGTB access enabled >>using tbpath=./TB >>0 piece tablebase files found >> >>Crafty v19.10 >> >>White(1): bench >>Running benchmark. . . >>...... >>Total nodes: 89942714 >>Raw nodes per second: 1835565 >>Total elapsed time: 49 >>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 13.061224 >>White(1): >> >> >>regards >>Andy > >With a good Windows binary running 64bit stuff you can probably figure you will >be able to get a 40% increase over GCC. This is what I got going from GCC to one >of my Intel C 5.0.1 binaries. This should put you up around 2.5 million >nodes/sec @ 2GHz. :) I don't bother with Intel C, because I use gcc for development. Is there an Intel C version of a 64bit binary of crafty around? Andy
This page took 0.22 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.