Author: Bo Persson
Date: 14:09:40 02/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2004 at 14:30:07, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >On February 12, 2004 at 13:24:35, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>On February 12, 2004 at 12:35:03, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >> >>>A fellow student of me got an Athlon64 3200 for his phD work at university and >>>installed the x86-64 version of Suse9. I could not resist to quickly compile >>>crafty to test the speed. :) >>> >>>unable to open book file [./book.bin]. >>>book is disabled >>>unable to open book file [./books.bin]. >>>EGTB access enabled >>>using tbpath=./TB >>>0 piece tablebase files found >>> >>>Crafty v19.10 >>> >>>White(1): bench >>>Running benchmark. . . >>>...... >>>Total nodes: 89942714 >>>Raw nodes per second: 1835565 >>>Total elapsed time: 49 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 13.061224 >>>White(1): >>> >>> >>>regards >>>Andy >> >>With a good Windows binary running 64bit stuff you can probably figure you will >>be able to get a 40% increase over GCC. This is what I got going from GCC to one >>of my Intel C 5.0.1 binaries. This should put you up around 2.5 million >>nodes/sec @ 2GHz. :) > >I don't bother with Intel C, because I use gcc for development. >Is there an Intel C version of a 64bit binary of crafty around? Intel C 64 only works for Intel Itanium. Somehow they have forgotten to implement AMD64 instructions... :-) Bo Persson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.