Author: blass uri
Date: 21:47:20 12/05/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 1998 at 07:56:13, Jürgen Hartmann wrote: > >On December 04, 1998 at 06:05:10, blass uri wrote: >> >>On December 04, 1998 at 05:29:33, Jürgen Hartmann wrote: >> >>>The thing I enjoy to do with a chess program is interactive analysis. Trying >>>different lines with a program gives you the illusion to do something >>>intelligent and achieves superior results to just letting it run endlessly on >>>one position on its own. >>> >>>In the famous game Maroczy vs. Tartakower from 1922, Black build up a typical >>>Stonewall kings attack and crowned it with an intuitive rook sacrifice. For a >>>human it is easy to see the immense practical chances of this sacrifice and it >>>would be the first candidate move to calculate. But Junior5 and the Crafty >>>engine don't find it overnight on my P300. >>> >>>The position after 17.Nd2 was >>> >>>r1b3k1/pp1n3p/2pbpq1r/3p4/2PPp1p1/PP2P1P1/1BQN1P1P/3RRBK1 b - - 0 17 >>> >>>17... Rxh2!! >>> >>>Does any program see this? >>> >>>The question is: Do we have a fantastically tough testing position in the league >>>of Nolot here or is it simply incorrect? >> >>I think that it is simply incorrect >>for example white can defend by 21.Qc3(Junior5's move) >> >>Uri > >21.Qc3 (protecting e3 to free the rook) Nh5 22.Rg2 Qh4+ 23.Kg1 Ng3 24.Rh2 Qg5 >(not Qxh2+ 25.Kxh2 Ne2+ =) 25.Rf2 Nf5 26.Re2 Nh4 27.Bg2 Nf3+ and Black wins. Instead of 26.Re2? Junior5 suggests after a long time 26.Nxe4 dxe4 27.d5 e5 28.dxc6 g3 29.Rxf5 Qxf5 30.Qe1 Qg6 and Junior5 evaluates the position as a small advantage for white. Uri > >Jürgen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.