Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 02:14:12 02/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2004 at 17:09:40, Bo Persson wrote: >On February 12, 2004 at 14:30:07, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On February 12, 2004 at 13:24:35, Aaron Gordon wrote: >> >>>On February 12, 2004 at 12:35:03, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>> >>>>A fellow student of me got an Athlon64 3200 for his phD work at university and >>>>installed the x86-64 version of Suse9. I could not resist to quickly compile >>>>crafty to test the speed. :) >>>> >>>>unable to open book file [./book.bin]. >>>>book is disabled >>>>unable to open book file [./books.bin]. >>>>EGTB access enabled >>>>using tbpath=./TB >>>>0 piece tablebase files found >>>> >>>>Crafty v19.10 >>>> >>>>White(1): bench >>>>Running benchmark. . . >>>>...... >>>>Total nodes: 89942714 >>>>Raw nodes per second: 1835565 >>>>Total elapsed time: 49 >>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 13.061224 >>>>White(1): >>>> >>>> >>>>regards >>>>Andy >>> >>>With a good Windows binary running 64bit stuff you can probably figure you will >>>be able to get a 40% increase over GCC. This is what I got going from GCC to one >>>of my Intel C 5.0.1 binaries. This should put you up around 2.5 million >>>nodes/sec @ 2GHz. :) >> >>I don't bother with Intel C, because I use gcc for development. >>Is there an Intel C version of a 64bit binary of crafty around? > >Intel C 64 only works for Intel Itanium. > >Somehow they have forgotten to implement AMD64 instructions... > >:-) > >Bo Persson With some luck the code from Intel leaks to the internet too and we can add the missing AMD64 instructions by ourselves. ;) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.