Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:13:44 02/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2004 at 08:34:41, Tord Romstad wrote: >On February 13, 2004 at 08:26:57, Dr. Oliver Brausch wrote: > >>On February 12, 2004 at 15:21:58, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>>Some people say that no Go program will be stronger than the best humans for at >>>>least another century, if ever! Today's best Go programs are far weaker than >>>>any Go professional. >>> >>>Hogwash. Computers will have more compute power than the human brain long >>>before a century passes. >>> >> >>I am not so sure about this, Dann. I have not played Go a lot, but it is >>really a very stratetical game. Chess is both stratetical and tactical, which >>is the fascinating point of chess. > >Actually, this could be said about Go as well. The difference is that in >Go, tactics rarely decide the game if the difference in strength between >the two players is big. In games between players of similar strength, >Go can be tactically extremely complicated (even more so than chess, I >would say). > >Tord What is the definition of tactics? You can say that everything is tactics if you search deep enough. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.