Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 06:15:43 12/06/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 1998 at 04:22:54, Harald Faber wrote: >On December 03, 1998 at 22:44:14, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Dear all: >>The issue about best settings for now CM6K is still debatable and so cannot be >>putted in the resource section. Not that we expect the last word from jehovah, >>but surely we don not want to ccarry to the center a dispute about what is the >>very best setting. I hope that hose people that is experimenting inm that field >>will be kind enbough to giove some data to support his own pet setting. A set of >>test should be apllied to several settings before reaching the divine state >>where you can expect to be elevated to the heaven of the resource section. In >>other worss, we must be sure this or that sectting is a resource, not a >>nuissance. >>fernando > >Fernando and Elvis, > >I simply suggested to put the WP and HF settings into the resource center and >mark them as "GOOD FOR CM4000/5X00". Would this be possible because these >settings are known and proved to be stronger/better than the orginal ones. CM6k >is outside this debate, I know and never claimed that these settings also work >for CM6k. This answer is 100 % correct; especially Harald's takeover / creation of the piece value has given steady proof for a long time, to be a VERY dedicate setting for CM 5.000. Tonight - ONE more time, I'll post the settings, I've found together with one of the most experienced gents in Comp. Chess scene, Hubert BEDNORZ. For CM 6.000 This a little elder gent, who doesn't communicate via internet - but one of the RARE - TRUE (!) experts here. c/u E.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.