Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:35:51 02/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2004 at 17:44:05, Drexel,Michael wrote: >Why do many (all?) chess engines continue to ponder a move after a huge fail >high? >They found most likely the refutation of the ponder move. >Why don't they start to ponder another move instead? >That does not make any sense to me. It is illogical on first glance, but what would you ponder otherwise? You have no "second best" move... > >Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.