Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 15:42:10 02/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2004 at 18:34:30, Will Singleton wrote: >On February 16, 2004 at 18:27:28, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On February 16, 2004 at 18:09:07, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >> >>>In the archives I found that several people have published corrected versions of >>>the ECM test suite. Could anyone please mention the link to the latest revision? >> >>the corrected one is not a corrected one but a raped one. Some good positions >>were thrown out because the persons in question didn't understand the position, >>or were confused because the great position did have a deep win, but not the >>annotated win but some other move was written down in the confusion one day. >> >>if something is hard to find it doesn't mean you should kick it out of a testset >>IMHO. >> >>So using a corrected ECM doesn't make sense. Using however the same ECM with >>improved solutions and alternatives makes more sense. > >Do you have such a version? I'd be interested in testing it. > >Will Yes i have such a corrected version (a position or 500 i corrected not the last 500). No i won't spread it. Ask Uri, he doesn't agree with my corrections anyway.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.