Author: Will Singleton
Date: 16:20:37 02/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2004 at 18:42:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 16, 2004 at 18:34:30, Will Singleton wrote: > >>On February 16, 2004 at 18:27:28, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2004 at 18:09:07, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>> >>>>In the archives I found that several people have published corrected versions of >>>>the ECM test suite. Could anyone please mention the link to the latest revision? >>> >>>the corrected one is not a corrected one but a raped one. Some good positions >>>were thrown out because the persons in question didn't understand the position, >>>or were confused because the great position did have a deep win, but not the >>>annotated win but some other move was written down in the confusion one day. >>> >>>if something is hard to find it doesn't mean you should kick it out of a testset >>>IMHO. >>> >>>So using a corrected ECM doesn't make sense. Using however the same ECM with >>>improved solutions and alternatives makes more sense. >> >>Do you have such a version? I'd be interested in testing it. >> >>Will > >Yes i have such a corrected version (a position or 500 i corrected not the last >500). > >No i won't spread it. Ask Uri, he doesn't agree with my corrections anyway. I'm asking you. I think a subset of ECM, by a chessplayer and programmer such as yourself, would be very valuable. And not only to me, but to the amateur computer-chess community at large. Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.