Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:41:28 02/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2004 at 18:42:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 16, 2004 at 18:34:30, Will Singleton wrote: > >>On February 16, 2004 at 18:27:28, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2004 at 18:09:07, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>> >>>>In the archives I found that several people have published corrected versions of >>>>the ECM test suite. Could anyone please mention the link to the latest revision? >>> >>>the corrected one is not a corrected one but a raped one. Some good positions >>>were thrown out because the persons in question didn't understand the position, >>>or were confused because the great position did have a deep win, but not the >>>annotated win but some other move was written down in the confusion one day. >>> >>>if something is hard to find it doesn't mean you should kick it out of a testset >>>IMHO. >>> >>>So using a corrected ECM doesn't make sense. Using however the same ECM with >>>improved solutions and alternatives makes more sense. >> >>Do you have such a version? I'd be interested in testing it. >> >>Will > >Yes i have such a corrected version (a position or 500 i corrected not the last >500). > >No i won't spread it. Ask Uri, he doesn't agree with my corrections anyway. Note only that I did not see his corrections and I cannot agree or disagree with something that I did not see. I am also not interested in his solutions(there are enough test suites that are better than ECM like arasan test suite or GCP that is practically part of ECM). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.