Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:46:38 02/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2004 at 16:26:35, Russell Reagan wrote: >On February 16, 2004 at 16:03:46, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>I am guessing that Lisp will have the approximate overhead of Java or VB.NET. >>Hence, you will have a factor of 4 handicap. > >Unless you use a lisp-to-c compiler, of course. These don't work very well, no better than the various other translators like "fortran to C". You just get C syntax, but fortran code. Because it is a raw line by line translation. I used to teach APL in a programming language class and students turned in APL that looked just like FORTRAN. Not the right idea...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.