Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:40:33 02/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2004 at 14:31:37, Mark Young wrote: >On February 17, 2004 at 14:24:23, Chessfun wrote: > >>On February 17, 2004 at 13:48:16, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>Hydra >>>8 x 2.8 Xeon & 8 FPGA Cards >>> >>>Total games 47 >>>Stored results 47 >>>White 24 >>>Wins 19 >>>Draws 16 >>>Losses 12 >>> >>>Results 27/47 = 57.4% >>>Opponents Elo 2604 >>>N Opponents 31 >>> >>>Rating 2634 >>> >>>I see nothing in the results or games to suggest at this time. That Hydra is the >>>end all, be all future of computer chess. >> >>Hydra had quite a few set up problems when first running on Playchess. >>There were a lot of losses on time. >> >>Prior to Paderborn it's rating was AFAIK about 2500 and since Paderborn again >>AFAIK it has lost only one game. >> >>Since Paderborn IOW maybe the last 10 games to my knowledge those results are >>accurate. But jumping to conclusions without basis is IMO pointless, for all you >>know they are experimenting with either hardware or software. >> >>Hopefully Erdogan will post to this thread. >> >>Sarah. > >Last 10 game results for Hydra +2 -4 =4 on Playchess.com Yes seems those 4 games are in the other thread. http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?349782 All I'm saying is it's hard to take the results seriously when there are other factors at play. Book moves (see other thread) hardware not being 8x and who knows what else. However there are also some really fast dual cpu's running at Playchess, and I would assume they will always have a chance to win. Sarah.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.