Author: Mark Young
Date: 11:44:16 02/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2004 at 14:40:33, Chessfun wrote: >On February 17, 2004 at 14:31:37, Mark Young wrote: > >>On February 17, 2004 at 14:24:23, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On February 17, 2004 at 13:48:16, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>Hydra >>>>8 x 2.8 Xeon & 8 FPGA Cards >>>> >>>>Total games 47 >>>>Stored results 47 >>>>White 24 >>>>Wins 19 >>>>Draws 16 >>>>Losses 12 >>>> >>>>Results 27/47 = 57.4% >>>>Opponents Elo 2604 >>>>N Opponents 31 >>>> >>>>Rating 2634 >>>> >>>>I see nothing in the results or games to suggest at this time. That Hydra is the >>>>end all, be all future of computer chess. >>> >>>Hydra had quite a few set up problems when first running on Playchess. >>>There were a lot of losses on time. >>> >>>Prior to Paderborn it's rating was AFAIK about 2500 and since Paderborn again >>>AFAIK it has lost only one game. >>> >>>Since Paderborn IOW maybe the last 10 games to my knowledge those results are >>>accurate. But jumping to conclusions without basis is IMO pointless, for all you >>>know they are experimenting with either hardware or software. >>> >>>Hopefully Erdogan will post to this thread. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>Last 10 game results for Hydra +2 -4 =4 on Playchess.com > >Yes seems those 4 games are in the other thread. >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?349782 > >All I'm saying is it's hard to take the results seriously when there are other >factors at play. Book moves (see other thread) hardware not being 8x and who >knows what else. > >However there are also some really fast dual cpu's running at Playchess, and I >would assume they will always have a chance to win. > >Sarah. You are making my point. I see the same results for Hydra that other people see on CCC. I see nothing yet to HYPE.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.