Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 11:46:15 02/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2004 at 12:52:36, Mark Young wrote: >On February 17, 2004 at 08:41:16, Bob Durrett wrote: > >> >> >>The fact is that Hydra whipped a bunch of conventional chess computers at >>Paderborn. That fact is indisputable. >> >>How??? >> >>How could Hydra, chugging away at the clock rate of a slow snail, win against >>the high-nps conventional machines? >> >>They say "nps isn't everything." But could the truth be "nps isn't anything"? >> >>Maybe conventional wisdom ["The Earth is flat"] isn't right after all. >> >>Does anybody understand what happened? I feel that the results were monumental! >> >>Bob D. > >What results are monumental? > >Winning one tournament? > >You act like a star struck kid who thinks his hero is unbeatable. In reality it >maybe all show. > >I would stay a fan of computer chess and not ask to many questions. As it is >clear you have little understanding of chess or computer chess. Thanks, Mark [Perceptions can be wrong sometimes.] Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.