Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 11:58:47 12/07/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 1998 at 20:58:54, Howard Exner wrote: >On December 04, 1998 at 20:00:10, Howard Exner wrote: > >>On December 03, 1998 at 00:08:28, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On December 02, 1998 at 15:25:48, Komputer Korner wrote: >>> >>>>On December 01, 1998 at 19:00:29, Milton Zucker wrote: >>>> >>>>>It looks like there is still one KKK Kup game which has not been completed >>>>>between Fritz 5 and CM 5500. Quoting from rule 8 posted on the web page: >>>>> >>>>>8) All games will be adjudicated by the date of December 1, 1998, 12:01 am >>>>>E.S.T. >>>>>if they haven't finished by that time. The start date is February 1, 1998. >>>>>The adjudication board will consist of Bruce Moreland, Chris Whittington >>>>>and Bert Seifriz. Hopefully this board will not have any games to adjudicate. If >>>>>your >>>>>program is ahead, please don't drag your heels on responding as this is a >>>>>scientific test and not a contest. I would have to annul that result if that >>>>>happens, but I expect that everyone understands that this is in the interest of >>>>>science.8) All games will be adjudicated by the date of December 1, 1998, 12:01 >>>>>am E.S.T. >>>>>if they haven't finished by that time. The start date is February 1, 1998. >>>>>The adjudication board will consist of Bruce Moreland, Chris Whittington >>>>>and Bert Seifriz. Hopefully this board will not have any games to adjudicate. If >>>>>your >>>>>program is ahead, please don't drag your heels on responding as this is a >>>>>scientific test and not a contest. I would have to annul that result if that >>>>>happens, but I expect that everyone understands that this is in the interest of >>>>>science. >>>>> >>>>>So my question is: How is the game adjudicated? >>>>> >>>>>...Milton... >>>> >>>>Readers are invited to post the PVs from their favourite engines to the CCC or >>>>RGCC. The Adjudication committee minus Bruce Moreland will then make some sense >>>>of it all. Adjudications are not scientific experiments unfortunately. Hopefully >>>>with enough analysis pouring in, we can get a consensus. >>>>-- >>>>Komputer Korner >>> >>> >>>Why not use the simpler idea Chris suggested. Get two operators to play the >>>game out on ICC. at what ever time control we deem appropriate... ie 5 minutes >>>per move or whatever. >> >>If this route is taken then the name "Correspence" > >Correspondence (Korrespondence in KK code) > >is null and void. >>Why change the format in midstream? > >It would need a new name like the KKKKup (Kmixed Ktime Kontrols Kup :)) >> >> >> That would resolve the games quicker than an involved >>>adjudication discussion and leaves the programs to their own devices to win >>>lose or draw. >> >>>I can run the KKup version of crafty since I saved it. All we need is an >>>operator for Rebel with some time... and the right rebel version... >>>and hopefully on a P6/200 so we don't have to worry with handicapping of any >>>kind (I would run with only one CPU)... > >Too bad an extension couldn't be granted here. Have KK snare two operators >that would play on with the same time controls as the KKup stipulated. That would be ideal but I don't think we should get in a situation where one Kup is not finished and the other one is starting. -- Kumputer Korner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.